- Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google, Inc., Yahoo!, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., AOL, LLC, and Lycos, Inc.; In the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Currently represent inventor in case involving allegations of patent infringement relating to search engine methodology.
- IA Labs CA, LLC v. Nintendo Corp. et al; in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Northern Division. Currently represent inventor in case involving allegations of patent infringement related to video game technology.
- Preservation Technologies, LLC v. Netflix, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Facebook, Inc., Sony Corp. of America, and Dish Network Corporation; in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Currently represent patent owners in case involving allegations of patent infringement related to the cataloguing, organizing, searching, rating, and provisioning of digital multimedia.
- Digital Reg of Texas, LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc., Valve Corp., Electronic Arts, Inc., Ubisoft Entertainment, Inc., Symantec Corp., Intuit Inc., AVG Technologies USA, Inc., Zynga Game Network, Inc., and Zynga, Inc.; in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. Currently represent patent owners in case involving allegations of patent infringement related to securing digital content, secure delivery of digital content, and tracking and authorizing use of digital content.
- Microlog Corp. v. Cisco Systems, et al; in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. Currently represent Maryland-based contact center technology company in case involving allegations of patent infringement related to queuing of multiple types of customer contacts.
- Multiservice Solutions LLC v. Cable One, Inc., Suddenlink Communications, Comcast Corp., and Charter Communications, LLC; in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. Currently represent patent owners in case involving allegations of patent infringement related to cable television receivers.
- Taylor, et al v. Turner Industries, et al; in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division and the Middle District of Louisiana, Baton Rouge Division. Currently represent over 250 individual plaintiffs in one of the nation’s largest mass action employment discrimination cases.
- Shell Oil Company, et al vs. Tesoro Corporation, et al; in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. DiNovo Price recently successfully defended Fortune 500 defendant in a case involving petroleum refining patents.
- TecSec, Incorporated v. Microsoft Corporation; in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division. DiNovo Price recently resolved a significant patent litigation matter on behalf of a privately-held encryption company against the world's largest software company in a case involving allegations of patent infringement, breach of contract, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation.
- United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Mitchell, et al v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., et al; In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. DiNovo Price recently resolved a matter on behalf of Intervenors in a significant racial discrimination claim filed by the EEOC alleging a hostile work environment and related violations of the Civil Rights Act. The settlement was the largest in the history of the EEOC’s Dallas office.
- Bluecurrent, Inc. v. Dell Marketing, et. al.; In the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division. DiNovo Price recently resolved a significant matter on behalf of a technology deployment company against one of the world’s largest computer manufacturers in complex litigation alleging theft of trade secrets and breach of contract; DiNovo Price called upon to spearhead significant and unique electronic discovery challenge.
