Representative Cases (continued)

  • Hospital Systems Corporation v. General Electric Company d/b/a GE Healthcare, FUJIFILM Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc., Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, and McKesson Information Solutions LLC; In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division.   DiNovo Price recently represented the inventor in a case involving allegations of patent infringement relating to picture archiving and communications systems (PACS).
  • Coronary Stent Visualization Corp. v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation; In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division.   DiNovo Price recently represented the inventor in case involving allegations of patent infringement relating to systems and methods for the visualization and display of medical procedures.
  • Dura Operating Co. v. Magna International, Inc.; in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division.  DiNovo Price recently represented defendants in case involving allegations of patent infringement related to automotive window products.
  • White, et al v. City of Dallas; in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division.  DiNovo Price recently resolved a significant mass discrimination case on behalf of a group of water and wastewater employees of the City of Dallas.
  • Hobley, et al v. Yellow Transportation Company, et al; in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division.  DiNovo Price recently resolved an employment litigation case on behalf of a group of former trucking company managers and hourly employees in case involving significant allegations of racial discrimination and retaliation.
  • Giddy Up, LLC vPrism Graphics, Inc., et al. In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division.  Representing a subsidiary of Elmer's Products, Inc., DiNovo Price attorneys recently secured a judgment in excess of $1.2 million after a jury found the defendant liable for fraud, violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and breach of a multi-year exclusive patent license agreement.
  • MessageOne, Inc. v. OneSuite Corporation; In the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division.  DiNovo Price recently resolved a matter on behalf of a leading provider of e-mail continuity services in a case alleging trademark infringement and unfair competition claims.
  • GWIN, Inc. v. Don Best Sports et al.; In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division; DiNovo Price recently resolved a matter on behalf of a gaming company in a case involving allegations of patent infringement regarding web-based prediction services.